EU AI Act External Framework Crosswalk
Generated Evaluation Status
This section is generated from the framework manifest and compatibility report. Do not edit it manually.
- Framework ID:
eu-ai-act - Manifest:
docs/external-frameworks/eu-ai-act.json - Compatibility report:
./reports/eu-ai-act.compatibility.json - Evidence class:
SOURCE_REVIEWED - Independently reproducible:
False - Comparative-testing claim allowed:
False - Missing reproducibility gates:
shared_test_vector, raw_output, timestamp, runtime_configuration, source_version_or_hash, replay_commands, declared_expected_outcome, independent_reproduction - Evaluation result:
COMPATIBILITY_EVIDENCE_ONLY - Cycle status:
FIRST_FRAMEWORK_CYCLE_COMPLETE - Execution authority claim:
False - Next bounded action: Add executable observations, raw outputs, pinned versions, replay commands, and independent reproduction before making comparative-testing claims.
- Posting source: generated compatibility report
- Generated status is descriptive compatibility evidence only.
Generated Authored Analysis Boundary
This section is generated. Do not edit it manually.
- Framework ID:
eu-ai-act - Framework name:
EU AI Act - Generated sections above this boundary may be rebuilt from registry, manifest, compatibility-report, and result artifacts.
- Authored analysis below this boundary may contain interpretation, notes, and framework-specific discussion.
- Generators must preserve authored analysis unless a future validator explicitly declares a migration path.
- Boundary rule: generated material is descriptive compatibility evidence only and does not create certification, endorsement, adoption, proof, or operational permission.
Generated Transition Mapping
This section is generated from the framework manifest. Do not edit it manually.
| Field | Generated Value |
|---|---|
framework_identity | EU AI Act |
source_reference | https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj |
source_version | Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 |
allowed_use_boundary | legal/regulatory crosswalk evidence only |
claims | regulatory obligation, risk classification, documentation, traceability, human oversight |
non_claims | no admissibility proof, certification, endorsement, legal advice, or execution authority |
input_artifact_type | legal/regulatory framework reference |
output_artifact_type | crosswalk and compatibility evidence |
actor_or_authority_model | external legal authority context; no StegVerse execution authority inherited |
evidence_model | documentation and traceability posture |
policy_or_rule_model | regulatory obligation and risk-classification reference |
delegation_model | not asserted by wiki entry |
decision_or_result_model | comparison evidence only |
execution_authority_claim | false |
receipt_or_trace_model | source reference and wiki record |
reconstruction_model | source plus crosswalk can reconstruct regulatory relationship limits |
SPE_overlap | may inform policy reference and review posture, not standing determination |
StegVerse_ecosystem_overlap | Policy Reference, Governance Boundary, Review Posture, Reconstructability |
fail_closed_conditions | missing source, undefined mapping, legal overclaim, or authority overclaim |
Generated mapping is compatibility evidence only.
Generated Framework Metadata
This section is generated from the external-framework registry. Do not edit it manually.
- Framework ID:
eu-ai-act - Name:
EU AI Act - Registry status:
SOURCED-CROSSWALK-PROVISIONAL - Testbench state:
SOURCE_RECORDED_CROSSWALK_PROVISIONAL - Manifest path:
docs/external-frameworks/eu-ai-act.json - Source reference:
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj - Metadata boundary: generated metadata is descriptive only; it does not create certification, endorsement, formalism adoption, admissibility proof, or execution authority.
Status
Relationship type: external framework crosswalk
Canonical StegVerse formalism source: Admissible-Existence
External framework role: legal/regulatory AI framework
Wiki role: convergence, mapping, and relationship review
Citation status: sourced
Evidence provenance status: Batch 3 refactor installed
Source
Official source: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj
Evidence Provenance
| Evidence Class | Current Evidence | Status | Missing Fields |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official Framework Sources | Official EU AI Act legal text URL. | present | Versioned source snapshot and source hash. |
| Official Implementation Sources | The EU AI Act is treated here as legal/regulatory text rather than a runtime implementation. | not_applicable_legal_text | Specific article/obligation snapshot if used in a fixture. |
| Observed Behavior | No runtime behavior is claimed. | not_applicable_for_runtime_result | Not a runtime-result page. |
| Reproduced Behavior | No independent reproduction is claimed. | not_applicable | Reproduction only if an obligation-mapping fixture is created. |
| StegVerse Analysis | Regulatory obligation, risk classification, documentation/traceability, human oversight, prohibited practices, and high-risk systems are mapped to admissibility primitives. | legal_obligation_crosswalk | Concrete mapping fixture and compatibility report. |
| Interoperability Assessment | EU AI Act material may provide legal or regulatory context for review posture, not authority. | pending_obligation_mapping | Fixture and report. |
| Standing | Sourced provisional. | provisional | Source snapshot and mapping artifact. |
Evidence classification:
F1: official EU AI Act legal text URL and legal-framework claims.
S1: StegVerse interpretation of the EU AI Act as regulatory and obligation-context evidence.
S2: mapping to Policy Reference, Governance Boundary, Evidence Posture, Review Posture, Receipt-Bound Execution, Reconstructability, Triad Governance Model, Runtime Transition Governance, and Fail-Closed review.
H1: future mapping fixture until concrete article/obligation references are attached.
Definition
The EU AI Act is Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, a legal framework for artificial intelligence in the European Union.
Framework-Term Definitions
| Native EU AI Act Term | Definition For This Wiki | Reconciliation Class | Admissibility Relationship |
|---|---|---|---|
| EU AI Act | External legal and regulatory AI framework for the European Union. | new | Preserved as legal-framework terminology. |
| Regulatory obligation | A legal or regulatory duty imposed by the framework. | adjacent | Related to Policy Reference and Governance Boundary. |
| Risk classification | Legal or regulatory classification of AI-system risk. | adjacent | Related to Evidence Posture and Review Posture. |
| Documentation and traceability | Required or expected records that support later inspection. | adjacent | Related to Receipt-Bound Execution and Reconstructability. |
| Human oversight | Required or expected human involvement in governed AI use. | adjacent | Related to Triad Governance Model and Runtime Transition Governance. |
| Prohibited practice | A legally restricted or disallowed AI practice. | adjacent | Related to Policy Reference and Fail-Closed review. |
| High-risk system | A legally classified AI system category with heightened obligations. | adjacent | Related to Review Posture and Governance Boundary. |
Relationship To Admissibility
The EU AI Act is useful as a regulatory crosswalk target for obligations, prohibited practices, high-risk systems, transparency, governance, and documentation.
It does not replace commit-time admissibility review, execution authority checks, receipt-bound execution, or Admissible-Existence formalism sources.
Crosswalk Targets
| EU AI Act Function | Wiki / AE Relationship |
|---|---|
| Regulatory obligation | Policy Reference; Governance Boundary |
| Risk classification | Evidence Posture; Review Posture |
| Documentation and traceability | Receipt-Bound Execution; Reconstructability |
| Human oversight | Triad Governance Model; Runtime Transition Governance |
Non-Claims
The EU AI Act is not a StegVerse canonical formalism.
The EU AI Act does not prove transition admissibility.
Regulatory compliance does not automatically grant execution authority inside StegVerse.
Challenge Path
A reader may challenge this reflection by identifying the claim, challenged field, reason, supporting evidence, and requested correction or standing change.
Mandatory Footer
This page reflects a bounded admissibility packet. Publication does not create standing. The reflected claim inherits only the standing that can be reconstructed from the referenced evidence, authority, and admissibility conditions.