Skip to main content

Agent Governance Playbook External Framework Crosswalk

Generated Evaluation Status

This section is generated from the framework manifest and compatibility report. Do not edit it manually.

  • Framework ID: agent-governance-playbook
  • Manifest: docs/external-frameworks/agent-governance-playbook.json
  • Compatibility report: ./reports/agent-governance-playbook.compatibility.json
  • Evidence class: SOURCE_REVIEWED
  • Independently reproducible: False
  • Comparative-testing claim allowed: False
  • Missing reproducibility gates: shared_test_vector, raw_output, timestamp, runtime_configuration, source_version_or_hash, replay_commands, declared_expected_outcome, independent_reproduction
  • Evaluation result: COMPATIBILITY_EVIDENCE_ONLY
  • Cycle status: FIRST_FRAMEWORK_CYCLE_COMPLETE
  • Execution authority claim: False
  • Next bounded action: Add executable observations, raw outputs, pinned versions, replay commands, and independent reproduction before making comparative-testing claims.
  • Posting source: generated compatibility report
  • Generated status is descriptive compatibility evidence only.

Generated Authored Analysis Boundary

This section is generated. Do not edit it manually.

  • Framework ID: agent-governance-playbook
  • Framework name: Agent Governance Playbook
  • Generated sections above this boundary may be rebuilt from registry, manifest, compatibility-report, and result artifacts.
  • Authored analysis below this boundary may contain interpretation, notes, and framework-specific discussion.
  • Generators must preserve authored analysis unless a future validator explicitly declares a migration path.
  • Boundary rule: generated material is descriptive compatibility evidence only and does not create certification, endorsement, adoption, proof, or operational permission.

Generated Transition Mapping

This section is generated from the framework manifest. Do not edit it manually.

FieldGenerated Value
framework_identityAgent Governance Playbook
source_referencehttps://github.com/a1k7/agent-governance-playbook/releases/tag/v1.0
source_versionv1.0 release
allowed_use_boundaryagent-continuation crosswalk evidence only
claimsagent continuation, continued allowance, governance playbook framing, release artifact
non_claimsno admissibility proof, certification, endorsement, or execution authority
input_artifact_typeplaybook release artifact
output_artifact_typecrosswalk and compatibility evidence
actor_or_authority_modelexternal playbook posture; no StegVerse authority inherited
evidence_modelrelease artifact and governance guidance
policy_or_rule_modelcontinued-allowance review boundary
delegation_modelnot asserted by wiki entry
decision_or_result_modelcomparison evidence only
execution_authority_claimfalse
receipt_or_trace_modelrelease reference and wiki record
reconstruction_modelsource plus crosswalk can reconstruct continuation relationship limits
SPE_overlapmay inform continuation review, not standing determination
StegVerse_ecosystem_overlapDecision Continuity, Runtime Transition Governance, Governance Boundary
fail_closed_conditionsmissing source, undefined mapping, or authority overclaim

Generated mapping is compatibility evidence only.

Generated Framework Metadata

This section is generated from the external-framework registry. Do not edit it manually.

  • Framework ID: agent-governance-playbook
  • Name: Agent Governance Playbook
  • Registry status: SOURCED-CROSSWALK-PROVISIONAL
  • Testbench state: SOURCE_RECORDED_CROSSWALK_PROVISIONAL
  • Manifest path: docs/external-frameworks/agent-governance-playbook.json
  • Source reference: https://github.com/a1k7/agent-governance-playbook/releases/tag/v1.0
  • Metadata boundary: generated metadata is descriptive only; it does not create certification, endorsement, formalism adoption, admissibility proof, or execution authority.

Status

Relationship type: external framework crosswalk
Canonical StegVerse formalism source: Admissible-Existence
External framework role: agent-continuation governance playbook
Wiki role: convergence, mapping, and relationship review
Citation status: sourced
Evidence provenance status: Batch 4 refactor installed

Source

Public source: https://github.com/a1k7/agent-governance-playbook/releases/tag/v1.0

The release is titled The Agent Governance Playbook v1.0 and frames the governance question around whether an agent should still be allowed to continue.

Evidence Provenance

Evidence ClassCurrent EvidenceStatusMissing Fields
Official Framework SourcesPublic release source URL.presentVersioned source snapshot and source hash.
Official Implementation SourcesRelease artifact reference is present.repository_release_presentCommit hash, asset hash, and artifact snapshot.
Observed BehaviorNo runtime behavior is claimed.not_startedPlaybook application case, inputs, outputs, timestamp, and source version.
Reproduced BehaviorNo independent reproduction is claimed.not_startedReproduction fixture for agent-continuation review.
StegVerse AnalysisAgent-continuation question, continued allowance, governance playbook framing, and release artifact are mapped to admissibility primitives.agent_continuation_crosswalk_with_page_provenanceContinuation-review-to-Commitment-Candidate fixture.
Interoperability AssessmentPlaybook material may provide continuation-review context, not authority.pending_commitment_candidateFixture and compatibility report.
StandingSourced provisional.provisionalRelease snapshot and fixture.

Evidence classification:

F1: public Agent Governance Playbook release URL and release-native claims.
F2: release artifact reference; hash/snapshot pending.
S1: StegVerse interpretation of agent-continuation review as governance context.
S2: mapping to Decision Continuity, Runtime Transition Governance, Approval vs Execution, Commit-Time Validity, Governance Boundary, Policy Reference, Evidence Posture, and Reconstructability.
H1: future continuation-governance fixture until concrete artifacts are attached.

Definition

The Agent Governance Playbook is treated in this wiki as an external governance playbook for agent-continuation review.

Framework-Term Definitions

Native Playbook TermDefinition For This WikiReconciliation ClassAdmissibility Relationship
Agent Governance PlaybookExternal playbook artifact for evaluating agent continuation governance.newPreserved as framework-native terminology.
Agent continuation questionThe question of whether an agent should still be allowed to continue.adjacentRelated to Decision Continuity and Runtime Transition Governance.
Continued allowanceA governance posture allowing continuation after review.adjacentRelated to Commit-Time Validity, but not equivalent to execution authority.
Governance playbookA procedural guidance artifact for governance review.adjacentRelated to Governance Boundary and Policy Reference.
Release artifactA published versioned artifact used as source evidence.adjacentRelated to Evidence Posture and Reconstructability.

Relationship To Admissibility

The Agent Governance Playbook is useful as an external comparison target for agent-continuation review.

It does not replace commit-time admissibility review, transition-table standing, receipt-bound execution, or Admissible-Existence formalism sources.

Crosswalk Targets

Agent Governance Playbook FunctionWiki / AE Relationship
Agent continuation questionDecision Continuity; Runtime Transition Governance
Approval versus continued allowanceApproval vs Execution; Commit-Time Validity
Governance playbook framingGovernance Boundary; Policy Reference
Release artifactEvidence Posture; Reconstructability

Non-Claims

The Agent Governance Playbook is not a StegVerse canonical formalism.
The Agent Governance Playbook does not prove transition admissibility.
A playbook release does not grant execution authority inside StegVerse.
The wiki relationship record is not acceptance of equivalence.

Challenge Path

A reader may challenge this reflection by identifying the claim, challenged field, reason, supporting evidence, and requested correction or standing change.

This page reflects a bounded admissibility packet. Publication does not create standing. The reflected claim inherits only the standing that can be reconstructed from the referenced evidence, authority, and admissibility conditions.