Skip to main content

Source Locator Intake and Specialist Routing

Purpose

This page defines the deterministic path for re-evaluating deferred external records when a stable source becomes available.

The path separates locator verification from specialist review and from governance promotion.

source locator submission
-> locator verification
-> evidence and bibliography reconciliation
-> specialist review routing
-> review outputs
-> promotion decision

Locator Verification Results

ResultMeaning
CONFIRMEDThe locator resolves to the declared source and supplies stable source identity.
PARTIALThe locator is stable and relevant but does not supply the complete source or all required bibliographic fields.
UNRESOLVEDNo stable locator is available or the locator cannot be verified.
CONFLICTINGThe locator resolves to material that conflicts with the declared source identity or record.
REJECTEDThe locator is invalid, unrelated, unsafe, or outside the declared intake scope.

Allowed Locator Types

URL
DOI
arXiv identifier
repository path
publisher record
citation record

Specialist Review Classes

Review classScope
physics_foundationsEmergent spacetime, quantum foundations, relativity, modular time, and entanglement-gravity arguments.
mathematical_formalismOperators, assumptions, derivations, domains, limitations, and equivalence claims.
admissibility_governanceTransition Table roles, authority boundaries, evidence posture, and promotion standing.

Current Route

route_id: route-lai-operational-architecture-v0-1
current_gate: SOURCE_LOCATOR_REQUIRED
current_result: DEFER
required_reviews:
- physics_foundations
- mathematical_formalism
- admissibility_governance
re-evaluation trigger: locator becomes CONFIRMED or PARTIAL with a stable retrievable source

Deterministic Re-evaluation Rule

When the locator result changes to CONFIRMED or qualifying PARTIAL, the route must:

  1. confirm the source identity against the bibliographic intake;
  2. compare the durable evidence summary with the retrievable source;
  3. identify drift, omissions, or contradictions;
  4. route the source to all required specialist classes;
  5. preserve each review result separately;
  6. issue a new promotion decision; and
  7. supersede, but never erase, the earlier deferred decision.

Non-Claims

Locator verification does not validate a source theory. Specialist routing does not imply specialist endorsement. A routing record does not create acceptance authority or execution authority.