Skip to main content

Receipt-Bound Execution

Equivalent Terms​

No accepted equivalent terms are recorded yet.

Equivalent-term claims should be submitted through the proposal lifecycle and accepted only through a decision record.

Overlapping Terms​

The following terms may overlap with receipt-bound execution, but are not treated as identical without review:

  • auditable execution;
  • traceable execution;
  • logged execution;
  • evidence-backed execution;
  • provenance-bound operation.

Adjacent Terms​

The following terms are adjacent because they may preserve evidence or history without necessarily binding execution to admissibility posture:

  • audit trail;
  • activity log;
  • event log;
  • provenance record;
  • signed attestation.

Definition​

Receipt-bound execution is execution connected to a durable record of the authority, policy, evidence, context, and decision posture present at commit time.

The receipt is not merely an activity log. It is governance evidence for why a transition result was accepted, refused, escalated, or rejected.

Why The StegVerse Term Is Retained​

The StegVerse term is retained because overlapping terms may record that execution happened without recording whether the transition had standing to bind consequence at commit time.

Receipt Purpose​

A receipt should help answer:

  • what action was proposed;
  • who or what proposed it;
  • which authority class applied;
  • which policy reference applied;
  • what evidence was available;
  • what decision was made;
  • what drift was detected;
  • whether the transition result was permitted to bind.
governance:
  proposal_link: "not_applicable"
  decision_link: "not_applicable"
  replay_link: "not_applicable"
  reconstruction_link: "not_applicable"